"Cities and states across America are denying sidewalk counselors and law-abiding citizens their rights to inform women about ...
Justice Clarence Thomas was mad the court didn't take a case about local laws regulating protests at abortion clinics, but ...
Pro-choice and pro-life advocates are assessing the impact of several recent moves by the federal government related to ...
The Supreme Court rejects challenges to abortion clinic buffer zone laws in Illinois and New Jersey, surprising observers.
2d
Tampa Free Press on MSNSupreme Court Denies Review Of Abortion Clinic Buffer Zone Case, Justice Thomas DissentsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a case challenging an Illinois city’s abortion clinic buffer zone ...
Anti-abortion activists brought the challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that their free speech rights were being violated ...
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict ...
The Court refuses a case on ‘sidewalk counseling,’ over a vigorous dissent.
On Monday, the Supreme Court handed abortion rights advocates a rare win when they declined to take up a pair of cases ...
Thomas, an appointee of former President George H.W. Bush, criticized the Supreme Court’s refusal to revisit Hill v. Colorado (2000), a precedent that upheld so-called free speech “buffer zones” ...
At issue was a 25-year precedent that allows local governments to create protest-free buffer zones around all health-care ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results